From Traditional School to Virtual Classroom: Students’ Lived Experiences on Blended Learning Implementation

Authors

  • Weena Mae Ampo Bohol Island State University-Candijay Author
  • Manuel Santiago M. Rullen Bohol Island State University-Candijay Author
  • Elenita O. Deguit Bohol Island State University-Candijay Author
  • Ruel V. Perocho Bohol Island State University-Candijay Author
  • Pamela Joy B. Romero Bohol Island State University-Candijay Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63236/

Keywords:

Blended learning, traditional learning, learning gap, digital inequality

Abstract

Blended learning has gained popularity as a teaching model because of recent changes in education. However, the experiences of students in this study's local context have not been thoroughly examined, creating a gap in the research. This study aims to fill that gap by reviewing students' lived experiences, with a focus on the issues and challenges they encountered during blended learning. Using a qualitative approach, the research involved ten college students from a rural higher education institution. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion, offering detailed insights into the topic. Thematic analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework. The findings showed a strong preference among students for traditional face-to-face learning. They felt it provided better understanding, retention, and direct interaction with instructors. A key theme that emerged was the stress students experienced during independent learning. Without clear instructions, timely feedback, or regular teacher support, students felt overwhelmed and solely responsible for their learning. Additionally, participants faced serious socioeconomic challenges, including unreliable Internet access, high data costs, frequent power outages, and interruptions from weather conditions. They also struggled to find learning support owing to a lack of quiet study areas, household chores, and childcare responsibilities. This created learning gaps and decreased student engagement. These findings underline the many obstacles that rural students encounter in blended learning environments, highlighting the need for immediate support measures. The study emphasizes the necessity for improvements in infrastructure, teacher training, and responsive policies to ensure fair and effective blended learning. It also contributes to the global conversation on UN SDG 4, pushing for inclusive, quality education in areas with limited resources.

References

1. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

2. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309

3. Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100072

4. Al-Maroof, R. S., Alhumaid, K., & Salloum, S. (2021). The continuous intention to use blended learning: Insights from the UTAUT model. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 245–254.https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.6.006

5. Alshammari, S. H. (2020). Faculty members' acceptance of blended learning in higher education: Application of the UTAUT2 model. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13445a

6. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

7. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

9. Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press.

10. Cleofas, J. V., & Rocha, I. C. N. (2021). Demographic, gadget, and internet profiles as determinants of disease and consequence-related COVID-19 anxiety among Filipino college students. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6771–6786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10541-w

11. Cohen, D., Greene, J., Toyinbo, P., & Siskowski, C. (2006). Young caregivers in the U.S.: Findings from a national survey. National Alliance for Caregiving.

12. Consolacion, R., Buan, A., Lucero, L., & Tanduyan, K. (2024). Blended learning pedagogy to support student-centered classrooms. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 4(3), 112–125. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/275983

13. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

14. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

15. Graham, C. R. (2019). Current research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 173–188). Routledge.

16. Graham, C. R. (2019). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.

17. Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63, 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

18. Ingrida, M., Taufiq, A., & Suparno, S. (2023). Poor network connection and high data consumption rates are common issues in online learning among science students. Education Sciences, 13(7), 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070704

19. Listiana, N., & Jaharadak, A. A. (2019). Blended learning as instructional media: Literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1167, 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012066

20. Mahmood, H. B., & Noor, S. B. M. (2020). Acceptance, effectiveness, and relationship of blended learning implementation among lecturers in Polytechnic Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin. International Journal of Integrated Education Engineering and Business, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijieeb.v3i1.1077

21. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

22. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2014). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–47.

23. Nguyen, T., Espiritu, C., & Rodrigues, M. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

24. Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online education: Worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262

25. Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–288. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/poon_0613.htm

26. Permata, I. M., & Nanda, B. J. (2021). Blended learning: Impact on student motivation and understanding. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210202.010

27. Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

28. Ramalingam, S., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Revised community of inquiry as a theoretical foundation for understanding students’ blended learning experiences. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210618.041

29. Saboowala, R., Ilyas, K. S. B. M., & Talukdar, R. K. Y. A. (2021). Inservice school teachers' perception of adopting online-offline mode of learning during the current crisis. Research Square (United States). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-410204/v1

30. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

31. Talosa, A. D., Acidera, R. A., Tamanu, M. J. M., & Sumer, J. J. M. (2025). Knowledge, self-efficacy, and effectiveness in leveraging blended delivery systems: A study of higher education teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 18(2), 709–726. https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/758

32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

33. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

01-09-2025

Issue

Section

Articles